logoalt Hacker News

potomushto • today at 2:23 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

I understand why that’s impressive. But I don’t feel much. I guess, I was just used to envy how much people can be absorbed by some idea to spend so much time implementing it. Now it feels like a single shotted nice-typography-and-all presentation at work that someone did 10 min before the meeting.


Replies

toddmorey • today at 2:44 PM

There's also an eerie feeling of emptiness to the outputs. They lack real intent. Glossy and technically impressive, but they don't tickle your brain. I think it's because they don't really communicate or give you that buzz of new insights. They are pretty but not _helpful_.

For example, I didn't learn about lenses or earthquakes or fusion messing with the controls on these.[1] I didn't know what to look at.

However, there were interactive exhibits at the Children's Museum I spent a long time exploring and loved. That's because they were carefully designed to really teach the concept?

[1] https://sael.net/fusion-pulse/?ref=earthquake-tower

➕ show 3 replies
tarkin2 • today at 5:39 PM

The achievement and commitment of others inspires us to reach further and further. Now that's being eroded I wonder what the future will hold.

vunderba • today at 3:01 PM

Another thing to keep in mind is that if you asked twelve different artists to render these cities from their descriptions, you would likely end up with twelve very different renditions.

Now imagine the same thing but each person is using Opus 5.5 - I’d wager there would be a lot of commonality among each of the outputs.

➕ show 1 reply
tmikaeld • today at 2:35 PM

Looking at the posts on HN AI topics lately, this seem to be the depressing sentiment.

If something that previously took weeks for a human to design, now takes 10 min, that means a whole week of salary went up in smoke.

When have we automated enough?

➕ show 3 replies
hbosch • today at 4:19 PM

Every decision a human makes has some level of intent. AI cannot intend, it can only suppose.