Flat 20 year ban would be simpler to implement.
> Flat 20 year ban would be simpler to implement
And structurally advantageous to incumbent firms with access to easy capital with which to ride downturns.
What if there's a few year downturn, so they lay off and want to hire back when it passes? Force them to hire offshore instead?
> Flat 20 year ban would be simpler to implement
And structurally advantageous to incumbent firms with access to easy capital with which to ride downturns.