alt Hacker NewsVery sensible comments. It is along the lines of the fury I get when I am confronted with an 11 page dump of an issue analysis created by an AI agent that makes no sense but I have to go through because customer shared it.
If you did’t bother to write it, I shouldn’t be bothered to read it.
Perhaps AI agents can have their own publications and magazines where they are the chairs and associate editors and reviewers.
Replies
dishantsethi • today at 11:59 AM
[flagged]
jwilber • today at 1:01 AM
Nobody came to him and forced him to read it, just like nobody is forcing you to read code I had chatgpt write.
If AI can solve such grand, outstanding math problems, and mathematicians argue these pure math problems are important, what’s the problem with them needing to read the output if they want to understand it?
➕ show 1 reply
>If you did’t bother to write it, I shouldn’t be bothered to read it.
You don't think this changes when the thing in question is a proof of a STEM problem no human has ever been able to solve?