logoalt Hacker News

dieselgate • today at 4:14 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

Is there more context anyone can give to help understand what’s going on: I read the post but curious if AGI is just morphing into SI in lingo? Why is it being politicized?


Replies

mattm • today at 4:35 PM

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inau...

> The terminology used by the Federal Government should reflect the transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people. Accordingly, the term “Super Intelligence” more appropriately captures the promise, potential, and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies. It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.

kyle-rb • today at 4:27 PM

A few weeks ago Donald Trump put a series of polls via Truth Social and Twitter with 3 choices for a replacement name for Artificial Intelligence (which according to him makes it sound like it's fake when it's actually real).

The initial choices were: "Supreme Intelligence", "Superior Intelligence", "Extreme Intelligence". [0]

Then he removed "Supreme Intelligence" because he said it reminded people of the failing Supreme Court, and it was down to just "Superior" or "Extreme". [1]

Then, presumably after some industry people talked him into a compromise, he decided it was actually between "Superior" or "Super Intelligence", and the latter won. [2]

[0] https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/2101350559328416142

[1] https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/2101698074166882517

[2] https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2102067457506611585

➕ show 3 replies
daemonologist • today at 4:27 PM

No, the directive is that all AI should now be called super intelligence (SI), and this stems from a single decision from the president rather than being an ongoing political debate. (AI was of course political before, but this terminology seems to have come out of nowhere.)

Why, I don't know. The OP's "purity test" theory is a possibility.

➕ show 1 reply
Supermancho • today at 4:26 PM

> Why is it being politicized?

The US (without the imagined AI valuations) is in a full blown recession. The US treasury/administration is leveraging belief/investment in AI to keep the numbers up (oversimplified, but not by much). This means the administration has a vested interest in keeping AI churning and investment growing with no fallback except maybe the chaos of trying to start off a wartime economy? Because there are few recognizable AI players and the administration is not above extortion (choosing winners), they are leveraging the DOJ regulatory powers (witholding introducing barriers) to push a new grift. The situation is not strictly political, as much as it's a form of corruption.

LastTrain • today at 5:42 PM

You can't seriously, this far into Trump, be asking this question. It is a loyalty test and those that are loyal will get more rewards.

➕ show 1 reply
api • today at 4:22 PM

Trump is doing another of his loyalty test stunts: give a ridiculous order, see who complies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD5eqBDPMDg

well_ackshually • today at 4:18 PM

The US's shit head in chief has unilaterally decided that it's no longer artificial intelligence but super intelligence. Now it's a game of waiting to see which of the lapdogs is the fastest one to obey.