logoalt Hacker News

carefulfungi • today at 5:40 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

I doubt deno could have funded its development purely from sponsorship. And Deploy generated real revenue (on its OEM/b2b side).

Jt is interesting to speculate on what might have been had Deno never been a profit-seeking company. But having worked there, I am reasonably confident in my assessment above.


Replies

afavour • today at 6:35 PM

I agree that should it need to be profit making then what’s e got makes sense. But hey, Node isn’t a profit making enterprise. Deno could have been the same.