logoalt Hacker News

usr1106 • today at 6:18 AM • 4 replies • view on HN

I don't use Telegram Desktop or Windows. But that's exactly the reason why I run Firefox in a firejail sandbox on Linux. The browser has only access to my Downloads folder. I know that it's considered untrusted and don't keep any files there for a long time.


Replies

freebsd_lovefes • today at 6:39 AM

Or the reason to run Firefox in a FreeBSD jail to get server-grade security. But the question is can an attacker get access to the Firefox profile data? Because you cannot block that from Firefox, obviously.

➕ show 1 reply
barrkel • today at 6:53 AM

I guess it also has access to the cookies for all your logins.

➕ show 1 reply
maqp • today at 7:02 AM

The little I have to run Telegram Desktop for, I run in a VM. I'd never let the little oligarch's code touch my desktop OS.

➕ show 1 reply
iririririr • today at 6:33 AM

interesting you mention. because Firefox doesn't have a way to disable the single instance functionality which was used on this telegram vulnerability.

one long time Firefox contributor have been for a couple years now removing every part of the --noremote option. even botching (Ooops!) the console notice that the flag was no-op some time ago.

➕ show 2 replies