logoalt Hacker News

api • today at 5:17 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

I believe the OP was talking about scientists, not social media influencers.

Also the statement was not “we will all be dead in 5 years.” It was “this could wipe out humanity if we don’t make huge changes in 5 years.” Time frame was not stated.

I think it’s hyperbole, and that the realistic take is “if we continue to make this problem worse the cost will compound until it becomes an existential risk to civilization.” That’s not extinction, but it’s very bad.

It’s a bit like running up credit card bills, except that we don’t even know the interest rate.


Replies

anonym29 • today at 5:38 PM

The influencer was citing a scientist, and the hyperbole (delivered seriously) is the root cause of the "boy who cried wolf" effect that caused large swaths of the population to now dismiss basically all climate science, including the valid, rational, non-hyperbolic findings.

It's also not just influencers, it's scientists and the leadership of scientific institutions directly, too.

"If there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late."

- Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [August 19th, 2008]

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-economist-debat...

"We cannot now afford to put off change any longer. We have to get on a new path within this new administration. We have only four years left for Obama to set an example to the rest of the world."

- James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies [January 17th, 2009]

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/jan/18/obama-cl...

➕ show 1 reply