What exactly looks bad about it? These models have been trained on high converting UX patterns. They are definitely homogenous but I am not sure they look bad.
> "high converting UX patterns"
That _is_ the problem: ostensibly serious writing laced with marketing / clickbaity patterns is off-putting.
The homogenization of the internet. The worst corporate speak PR pages are now what gets generated for every pet project
Everything. It's horrible. Bad colors, cringe delivery, awkward prose.
It's quintessential ai slop.
But that's fine, because nobody forced me to read it, so I'm unbothered.
It lacks in... everything.
Like when you were a kid goofing around with some art supplies and you tried to mix every color of crayons, markers, watercolors, and/or colored pencils together to be both anything and everything all at the same time: It's just a sea of homogeneous brown yuck.
That homogenized yuck might work for code that is ultimately interpreted by a machine and that performs some kind of human-described function, but in writing (and in menu boards) it's just highly-emphatic sludge.