logoalt Hacker News

dofm • today at 10:00 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

> it's the fact that they have to train the next iteration right away due to competition

That it would be profitable if only there were no competition is not a really strong starting point for an IPO, though, is it?

(It is, however, the winner-takes-all world view Anthropic still seems to operate with)


Replies

vidarh • today at 10:12 AM

Their competition has the same problem. They're engaged in a giant game of chicken (or giant game of "who runs out of ability to raise more cheap capital first") with respect to overspending on training relative to inference revenue.

So, yes, it's high risk - you're basically betting on who will be in the strongest position when one or more of the competitors are forced to slow spending and the rest are able to ease off on theirs as well as a consequence.

If you think either that Anthropic is in a strong enough position to come out on top or that we'll end up with a detente like with the big cloud providers where they big providers feel they have a strong enough position to beat off upstarts and collectively basically stop competing other than on the margins because they all know they'll earn more by protecting their margins than by internal competition, then the IPO might be worth putting money on.

I think the latter scenario is slightly lower risk, but still risky given how small the moat appears to be vs. the Chinese labs (I say this as I just had Kimi re-design a website in 10 minutes by just giving it the URL to the current one and tell it to replicate everything; they might not be as smart as the frontier models yet, but they're capable enough that they're taking over an increasing proportion of my token budget)

➕ show 1 reply