IMO the README is not Claudish, this project is in an area that is more "computer science" than "coding" and there is simply a high bar on whats needed for prior knowledge. I think you could say ELI5 "Explain Like I'm 5" and it probably is possible to do so, but I don't think its correct to say "claudish".
I read it and I understand it, but the style of the writing is anathema to me.
I'm noticing an awful lot of tricolon, i.e., naming things in threes. Ive gotten the impression that LLMs are really fond of that device.
Pangram rates it (up to "This README is arranged by responsibility:") as 100% AI generated. I'm struggling to disagree.