logoalt Hacker News

lxgr • today at 5:06 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

To not control any industrial processes remotely? I hope you realize that requiring that would make solar and wind farms completely non-viable, among many, many other things.


Replies

mrweasel • today at 6:06 PM

Leased lines, MPLS, custom routing setups, hell just a VPN that fails closed. There are so many options for doing this, all more secure that just slapping a device online behind whatever router the cheapest ISP gave you.

The problem is that many of these setups are put behind essentially consumer connections, but with a better support contract or simply fitted with a 5G modem and a SIM card from the cell provider with the cheapest plan.

Building a WAN isn't magic, but it does require working with (competent) ISPs and paying the higher cost.

SoftTalker • today at 5:27 PM

Remote control does not mean "has a public IP address."

Yes you might need to be able to centrally monitor and manage things but that should be happening on a private network.

➕ show 1 reply
iugtmkbdfil834 • today at 5:24 PM

Surely, there must be a way that does not force the devices onto world wide web..

➕ show 1 reply
iAMkenough • today at 5:23 PM

I'm interested to know how many "legacy" controllers no longer patched by the manufacturer are operating solar and wind farms today.

If it's a lot, maybe the manufacturers should be compelled to provide security patches if remote control is required to operate their products. For the sake of national security, of course.