logoalt Hacker News

pulvinar • yesterday at 7:45 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

There are different grades or constructions of hardcovers. What you're describing is likely a cheap adhesive casebound. At the other end are the lay-flat hardcovers with sewn signatures and a specially constructed flexible spine. Those are a joy to read.


Replies

btilly • yesterday at 7:51 PM

The high quality hardcovers address none of the complaints.

They are big, and bulky. They don't fit into a backpack. And you can't simply hold them in one hand and read, anywhere you sit. Like a bench in a garden. You need a space dedicated to reading them.

In terms of utility, hardcovers are strictly worse.

➕ show 3 replies
BeetleB • yesterday at 8:33 PM

If they're bigger than paperbacks (dimensions and weight), then they're inferior.

Sure - if I have a nice chair to sit on in the evening, with good lighting, and can rest it on something, they're quite nice. But the bulk of my reading is either outside of home (so they need to fit in my bag nicely) in an uncomfortable chair, or while lying down so I need to hold the book up. Weight/size really matters here.

When I was a kid I asked around, and in those days the reasons I was given were:

1. They're durable - less likely to fall apart - and may last generations.

2. The font is bigger.

➕ show 1 reply
ChickeNES • yesterday at 8:29 PM

No they are not, who wants to haul around a book when my kindle fits in my pocket? One I can’t read in the dark without an external light?