alt Hacker News"Largely correct" my 2010 python 2 code is "largely correct".
Replies
ahartmetz • today at 2:32 PM
You are saying that there are only incorrect and mathematically proven with nothing meaningful in between?
➕ show 3 replies
"Largely correct" my 2010 python 2 code is "largely correct".
You are saying that there are only incorrect and mathematically proven with nothing meaningful in between?
No, Python has not the level of "correct" that rust has.
`sum(a:int, b:int)`
not guaranteed ANYTHING.
The gulf between how much correct Rust is and the vas majority of languages is HUGE.