logoalt Hacker News

CJefferson • today at 4:05 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

It's been 14 years since I reported you can't search for "wedding" in Bugzilla, have they ever fixed it, they hadn't last time I checked:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752844

(The bug is they do 'clever matching', so wedding matches weds, and too many emails you weds for wednesday, you can't say 'just show the word I ask you for')


Replies

janci • today at 4:58 PM

Yeah, the search in Thunderbird never worked for me, so I use the quick filter. Apparently it does not use the index (and is slower), but it works.

michelb • today at 4:36 PM

That thread is both hilarious and sad. Incredible that nobody has forked the project simply to implement a working search.

➕ show 2 replies
NoboruWataya • today at 5:18 PM

If you sort by relevance it seems to prioritise the word you asked for? I searched "wedding" and the first few hundred results were all emails about actual weddings. It was only when I sorted by date I saw the "Wed" results.

dpkirchner • today at 5:50 PM

Well, they are funded by Google after all -- infamous for replacing or ignoring search terms entirely.

encom • today at 7:54 PM

Many such cases. Duckduckgo is practically unusable because it just decides for itself which of my search terms it actually searches for. I have to explicitly quote every word to get it to function like a search engine.

Meanwhile, Netflix search (on Apple TV at least), is not only practically unusable, but literally so. Doesn't matter what you input, it just returns a random selection of films. I saw Kill Bill the other day, and wondered if there were any other Tarantino films on there. "Tarantino" returned things like Indiana Jones and other completely nonsensical results.

Am I the only one around here who knows SQL?