logoalt Hacker News

AOSP Source Releases Are So Late Developers Disassemble Libraries to Report Bugs

245 points • by tharen • today at 6:18 AM • 116 comments • view on HN

Comments

kodebach • today at 7:38 AM

I can't prove it, but I still think this is (partly) due to a recent EU regulation majorly backfiring. I can't remember which one it was, but one of the recent regulations mandates that devices get updates for a certain period. Within that period a manufacturer must provide each update for all their devices in a short timeframe. The intention was to prevent flagships getting updates immediately and lower end devices having to wait months. However, due to some (also well intentioned) wording about open source, the release of the source code is counted as the first release of an update and starts the timer. I'm pretty sure Google is delaying public AOSP updates to give their partners (mainly Samsung I suppose) more time to finish building their updates on top of AOSP.

➕ show 9 replies
userbinator • today at 7:14 AM

One character: a plain compare loop. Correct.

Not surprisingly, I get slight hints of Claudism in the text.

AI "opening" the source of software is one of the best things I've seen going for it so far.

➕ show 3 replies
evan_a_a • today at 9:43 AM

Bit of a hyperbolistic title. The core of the bug report doesn't require disassembly of the library. The bug author just went the extra step to do a root cause investigation, which of course requires light reversing work.

reddalo • today at 7:11 AM

The new Google motto seems to be "be as evil as you can".

We need an Android alternative, something that respects users' freedom.

➕ show 7 replies
Retr0id • today at 9:16 AM

It'd be mildly amusing if this led to someone doing an AI-powered decompilation of AOSP.

duttonw • today at 6:55 AM

Google not releasing won’t help now in the ai age….

pjmlp • today at 8:00 AM

Good look with NDK issues, having the source code available would not help much anyway.

NDK seems to be handled like a 20% project in terms of allocated resources, I bet it has not more that like 2 FTEs, given its progress since Android 2.1.

typ • today at 8:10 AM

Given the current trajectory of all things, I think that the drawbacks will outweigh the benefits for a project like AOSP due to the changing economics. The reduction of SBOM (and therefore the attack surface) will be far more beneficial than the saving of work from hundreds of imported dependencies. The trend of vertical integration will likely happen in software sooner or later.

mentalgear • today at 7:27 AM

I wonder if they use already / what their experience is with "REA Reverse – Engineer Anything" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028275).

jackdaniel • today at 7:09 AM

corporate incentives turned into a laughing stock :p

slim • today at 6:55 AM

It's time to fork it

➕ show 3 replies
raverbashing • today at 8:13 AM

Is it just me or Google has a lot of those silly bugs, where it seems nobody is thinking for 2 seconds on what they're actually doing?

NooneAtAll3 • today at 8:49 AM

just fork the android already, ffs

hanumseous • today at 9:36 AM

[flagged]

jjjegly • today at 8:52 AM

[flagged]

jjjegly • today at 8:48 AM

[flagged]

tangyumin • today at 8:08 AM

[flagged]

yieldcrv • today at 7:09 AM

every generation of control freak eventually gets tired of Android as the features that actually have market traction get merged into iOS

just hang up the hat and never look back

➕ show 2 replies
mentalgear • today at 7:28 AM

Fork them!