No. There is no link. But crucially, they have given you modern source-code for the entire thing. You should be able to use an LLM agent to produce a similar tool. And the diversity of such tools may well restore diversity of textual conversation.
I don't see the source code, where did you find that?
[Edit] Or are you implying that readers should direct an LLM at the entire article and expect an equivalent tool to be produced
I don't see the source code, where did you find that?
[Edit] Or are you implying that readers should direct an LLM at the entire article and expect an equivalent tool to be produced