logoalt Hacker News

sdcfgy • today at 8:57 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

What other providers did they shift to? So we can block them?


Replies

Gigachad • today at 9:06 PM

Most social media bots are not hosted in datacenters. They are run on racks of mobile phones on regular cellular networks. Using real phones and residential IPs makes them harder to detect. These are often hosted around the world so they can appear as in your country while being remote controlled from Russia.

gruez • today at 9:05 PM

From the article:

>Our analysis here is a reminder that client ASN traffic volume is an unreliable proxy for interpreting automated bot behavior. Defending against automated threats requires inspecting request behavior, such as identifying shared JA4 fingerprints, monitoring anomalous request rates, and applying WAF rules to sensitive endpoints, regardless of which network the request originates from. Physical infrastructure is static, but malicious automation is built to move.

Of course they're tooting their own horn that you need their advanced features and expertise to block all the bots, but it's approximately true. At the very least it's hard to block purely on ASN without inflicting massive collateral damage on privacy conscious users (ie. using VPN), because baddies can (and do) use the same commercial VPNs.

amelius • today at 9:59 PM

What if they moved to AWS?

dwroberts • today at 9:14 PM

Two hosts they name in the post are Radist and Selectel

tmp10423288442 • today at 9:16 PM

Residential proxies