logoalt Hacker News

Zero-Click Spyware Delivered via Targeted Ads: AdFection

225 points • by jcomp • today at 10:43 AM • 48 comments • view on HN

Comments

Frieren • today at 3:31 PM

Ads providers should be held responsible for delivering malware. All the tracking (that includes fingerprinting for clients that do not want to be tracked) should also be illegal.

How is this acceptable for society goes beyond me. And then corporations blame individuals when they get scammed. It is your fault that we have all your information and leak it everywhere, when it is not just directly sold.

And add jail time to fines. Fines means nothing for the rich.

➕ show 10 replies
Crane992 • today at 7:01 PM

It doesn't make sense how this is even possible.

joshAg • today at 6:49 PM

As much as it sucks for the ecosystem that's built itself up around the world wide web, good ad blockers and fingerprinting protection are as important as firewalls and antiviruses now. There's no more babies in this fetid bathwater.

itissid • today at 6:46 PM

How paranoid should one be of, say for example, a wasm vulnerability exploited on zero day by a bad JS ad?

I am scared for my parents to get exposed to this kind of thing from bad ad network actors. Does anyone have some practical concrete recommendations they took? Like I don't think they can install ublock origin and whitelist sites on demand in Firefox they way I do.

The only practical thing right now is to make sure they don't have the money on device and have 2 fac for email and bank accounts. But every now and then there are phishing attamepts that they could fall prey to.

zahlman • today at 6:28 PM

Awful lot of words here, but not much explanation of the actual capabilities of the "zero-click spyware". Tacking on the phrase "zero-click" suggests some kind of browser exploit, but it seems like this is just the same sort of thing as tracking cookies, third-party telemetry etc.

➕ show 2 replies
fhdkweig • today at 2:25 PM

A later submission has more comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50103000 , 57 comments 1 hour ago

➕ show 1 reply
saagarjha • today at 3:47 PM

I’m a little confused how mobile ad targeting ends up as a DLL hijack?

➕ show 3 replies
the_giraffe • today at 3:55 PM

Someone should look at mergers of large digital advertising companies after Trump's most recent election... And then look at the timing of it. The countries involved happened to be Israeli and have many employees based out of Argentina. Which is crazy since the United States, Israel and Argentina happened to become extremely close after that election cycle...

The CTO happens to have worked for Radware

https://radware.com/

https://www.innovid.com/about-us/news/mediaocean-completes-a...

➕ show 1 reply
kleiba2 • today at 11:09 AM

uBlock Origin ftw

kotaKat • today at 2:50 PM

Apps should be required to disclose every single ad network they use as part of their app store disclosures. I want a lot more transparency as to where the ads are coming from inside the app itself.

I've witnessed consumer apps throwing quite heinous malware/sketchware advertisements and watched the banners rotate between 4-5 different ad vendors to keep things hot and spicy.

➕ show 1 reply