logoalt Hacker News

triceratops • today at 3:37 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

30-35% of the cost of running a city bus is the driver.

Imagine what cities could do with 50% higher bus frequency or more bus routes.


Replies

tempest_ • today at 3:46 PM

Buses / Trams are the best use of this tech since not only is a high percentage of the cost the driver but they also drive the same predictable routes and not all over the place.

There are issues though. If you remove the staff from the bus you will need to handle some particularly unruly passengers in a different way. Currently the driver just stops until that person leaves or gets police / special constables involved.

wetwater • today at 4:44 PM

Where are you getting this number? Imagination is free but to execute the imagination is not. So yes, it depends on the imagination of the person who owns the tech AI company not your imagination.

And what is the cost of replacing the driver with the hardware/software and the servicing cost. and the operators in Philippines that are remotely working ?

➕ show 1 reply
heyodai • today at 4:00 PM

If you've ever seen bus drivers in NYC, it's genuinely impressive how they manage to weave a giant box through the chaos. I'm not sure that self-driving tech will be able to replace them anytime soon.

This would be interesting for my native Kansas City though. There's a severe shortage of buses and it's much simpler driving conditions. Could be a game changer.

➕ show 1 reply
ks2048 • today at 4:31 PM

But, Waymo removed the driver and it's not cheaper than Uber, correct?

➕ show 1 reply
SoftTalker • today at 3:55 PM

Have more buses blocking traffic?

➕ show 1 reply
iLoveOncall • today at 3:44 PM

Ok except apparently Waymo is more expensive than human-driven alternatives.

➕ show 1 reply