logoalt Hacker News

ks2048 • today at 3:49 PM • 7 replies • view on HN

So, Meta will spend millions/billions on building open-weight models and then people will send Apple $20,000 to run them. Seems like a good deal for Apple.


Replies

Juvination • today at 3:58 PM

Exactly why does Apple need to do any model training/development? They are out here selling the shovels.

➕ show 5 replies
loeg • today at 4:35 PM

How big is the local LLM market? I have trouble imagining Apple will move enough units to make $20k/ea worth it for them as a business segment.

➕ show 4 replies
GeekyBear • today at 4:04 PM

How many 5080 16 Gig cards would you have to buy to run the same model, and what would that cost?

➕ show 1 reply
reilly3000 • today at 3:59 PM

They have the best strategy of bigtechco: let others figure out the squishier layers while they focus on selling the best hardware. Privacy has incredible value to a lot of individuals and industries. $20-80k in hardware that *appreciates* the moment you buy it is a reasonable investment for a lot of SMBs, and still less than a single Nvidia rig. Privacy pays.

➕ show 1 reply
informal007 • today at 4:17 PM

It won't be free for Apple to use Meta's model in the future.

➕ show 1 reply
rvz • today at 4:13 PM

Both companies are profitable and AI is not their main line of business. This affects pure AI companies.

As open weight models continue to match frontier models, the race to $0 will continue to benefit supporters of running open weight models locally.

srmatto • today at 4:12 PM

[flagged]