> for a wide variety of usecases

For a wide variety of usecases, not for every isolated usecase. Today, AVIF is better for showing people ads^W^W^W web content delivery. This article is titled “JPEG XL vs. AVIF for web use-cases”. The other article recently discussed¹ is subtitled “Investigating JPEG XL's place as a Web image codec” and ends:

> JPEG XL isn't useless; it is genuinely compelling technology for use cases beyond the Web.

¹ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690554

(Either way, can we agree to take webp out behind the barn?)