logoalt Hacker News

Mashimo • today at 8:26 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

People on reddit claim it's bad at generating images of people, apparently because they removed anything close to nsfw from the training set. Anyone already tried it?


Replies

vunderba • today at 9:56 PM

I've been running it through tests on my local machine. The Text-to-Image component is VERY poor. It's not a good sign when the stock ComfyUI Flux3 Klein template with built-in config/prompts produces SD 1.5 levels of half-melted faces and various other body horror.

Flux 2 Klein 9b also had anatomical issues as well, but this one feels practically lobotomized.

https://imgpb.com/wDGGs

minimaxir • today at 8:39 PM

Some examples of the Reddit posts/memes:

https://reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1x79gth/why/

https://reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1x7ktbu/enshit...

I gave Flux 3 Klein my typical human test that has never failed on newer image models and it did fail; in addition to lower quality, the fingers were definitely not the correct proportions.

Whether the cause is due to more safeguards against NSFW content is hard to confirm technically; it was more an intuition back in the Stable Diffusion XL days but I suspect modern training paradigms are better at correlative inference.

➕ show 1 reply
ThrowawayTestr • today at 10:10 PM

Lame. Back to Chroma it is then.

spottedmarley • today at 9:14 PM

There's a base version for LoRA training so a porn adapter is likely already being built.