logoalt Hacker News

enraged_camel • today at 8:33 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

Anthropic has been profitable for the past two quarters.


Replies

tedd4u • today at 9:14 PM

"Anthropic told investors that it will profit on a measure called adjusted operating income.

"According to the report, adjusted operating income excludes stock-based compensation, which is not unusual for technology companies. However, the report also quotes its gross margins - above 80% - exclude revenue shared with distribution partners, as well as the cost of training its models."

From https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/2026091414/the-...

➕ show 2 replies
rhdunn • today at 8:55 PM

How so? Can you link to the numbers?

Antropic's revenue is up [1], [2], [3] and if you calculate adjusted operating income (by excluding most expenses like training costs) then by that measure it is profitable. However, if you factor in all the numbers it is operating at a loss.

[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/anthropic-v...

[2] https://fortune.com/2026/09/29/anthropic-leaked-ipo-prospect...

[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/anthropics-third-quarter-rev...

layoric • today at 8:38 PM

Source? Only reports I’ve seen was they were profitable for one month in last quarter due to xAI discount of renting out colossus . Be interested to learn otherwise.

YmFzZTY0ZGFkZHk • today at 8:46 PM

Profitable as in after expenses.

https://youtu.be/T-oXyXwD6sE?si=tauzXVyGmQ6MhI_5

lbrito • today at 10:04 PM

That's factually incorrect, and shouldn't be allowed here.

surgical_fire • today at 8:43 PM

We're talking about being actually profitable, not fake profitable.

tracerbulletx • today at 9:16 PM

“I think that, every time you see the word EBITDA, you should substitute the words "bullshit earnings.” ― Charles T. Munger

And what they're reporting is adjusted even further than EBITDA

adammarples • today at 8:43 PM

Yes when you subtract expenses and capex