logoalt Hacker News

gruez • yesterday at 6:46 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

>The agents are clearly not accidentally compromising systems

That would be argument for jailing the agent, but that's not really an option. "Jailing the closest person we can jail" also isn't a recognized legal principle. If your dog mauled someone, it'd be hard to argue that the dog didn't intend to maul that person, but you wouldn't automatically be criminally liable either.


Replies

Aeolos • yesterday at 6:53 PM

I don't know about your country of origin, but in my country you are certainly liable and can go to jail if your dog seriously injures or kills someone.

Edit: the dog will also be taken from you and put down if it is deemed a risk to other people.

braingravy • yesterday at 6:59 PM

Yes, you are. If a dog mauls someone, it’s the owner that’s responsible. This is basic common law, long established.

See People v. Knoller, 41 Cal. 4th 139 (2007). https://capcentral.org/case_summaries/people-v-knoller/

➕ show 2 replies
jchw • yesterday at 6:57 PM

It's a program on their computer that they ran on purpose... And yes you are definitely criminally liable for things your dog does.

➕ show 1 reply
leovailati • yesterday at 6:54 PM

Sorry, but at least in the US you are 100% liable if your dog hurts someone.

➕ show 1 reply