See California Civil Code § 3342(a).; https://california.public.law/codes/civil_code_section_3342
“…regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness.”
>>but you wouldn't automatically be criminally liable either.
>California Civil Code
>The owner of any dog is liable for the damages ...
How are you still missing the criminal/civil distinction, when it was mentioned in my original comment AND the comment you were replying to?
>>but you wouldn't automatically be criminally liable either.
>California Civil Code
>The owner of any dog is liable for the damages ...
How are you still missing the criminal/civil distinction, when it was mentioned in my original comment AND the comment you were replying to?