logoalt Hacker News

devin • yesterday at 8:36 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

I'm a lisp nerd, but why do you say sexps are the answer here? I think the point of a lot of configuration formats is that they don't want their configuration to also be a full-fledged programming language.


Replies

jimbokun • today at 12:58 AM

Sexps, on their own, are not a programming language.

majormajor • yesterday at 9:45 PM

> I think the point of a lot of configuration formats is that they don't want their configuration to also be a full-fledged programming language.

That seems to be everyone's initial goal, but then it inevitably gets leaky.

I think the dominant split here that forces everything into a weird mismash is that nobody really wants to have to understand arbitrary programming language configs for third-party stuff, they want to read config and know what's going on. BUT for their own stuff, they find reasons to want more power and expressibility...

➕ show 1 reply
gustavus • yesterday at 8:58 PM

> they don't want their configuration to also be a full-fledged programming language.

They say they don't want it but every configurmation format eventually ends up becoming turing complete at some point.