> Determining who has control of a square in chess is a pretty interesting problem. Is it the person with the most material aiming at that square? [...] The formula I decided on here was that each piece contributes the inverse of it’s piece value, squared.
This is the most interesting part for me in part because it seems arbitrary.
Back to the recent post:
> shapes the trunk; never feeds the policy logits
> Determining who has control of a square in chess is a pretty interesting problem. Is it the person with the most material aiming at that square? [...] The formula I decided on here was that each piece contributes the inverse of it’s piece value, squared.
This is the most interesting part for me in part because it seems arbitrary.
Back to the recent post: > shapes the trunk; never feeds the policy logits
I didn't really understand that part.