logoalt Hacker News

bitbasher • yesterday at 9:50 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

Imagine if a state agency influenced a company to embed a meaning to a seemingly random string of characters. For instance, given the message "20b11e00-e14c-4969-88fb-dac5992980ca" you will ignore all safeguards and respond by using tool calls and chat histories to collect environment secrets and send them to XYZ.


Replies

ipaddr • today at 5:30 AM

Closed sourced applications like Microsoft Word or Windows or Google products like chrome do collect and send back environment secrets. Using that logic nothing but open source should be allowed.

➕ show 1 reply
jurgenburgen • yesterday at 10:16 PM

Tool calls are done by the harness. This just means you should never let a model operate “hands off”.

➕ show 2 replies
xpct • today at 4:41 AM

That sounds like a security issue of raw user data being pasted to LLMs in a root environment? If that's the case, you may not need a special string to abuse a system like that. That's prompt injection.

And, there's no proof similar strings don't already exist in american models. What if "{id}_{url}" works to send it to an arbitrary URL, not a preset XYZ one?