logoalt Hacker News

jfaat • today at 11:29 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

I mean you keep using the words intentional and sabotage but you provide 0 proof of either. This isn't a political thing to me- I'm not defending Xi here. I'm defending logic. Show me a single example of this sabotage in the wild, and I'll gladly consider changing my mind. Show me any proof of intention and I'll do the same. That's supposed to be the bar here, isn't it? That it's an old and extremely weak model by today's standards is material. I wasn't crying foul because it's not aligned with the reality I want.


Replies

schiffern • today at 1:32 PM

"Sabotage" is trivial. You mention XYZ, performance degrades. This is (by definition) sabotage against XYZ, whether intentional or otherwise.

"Intentional" is an interesting point to press me on. No respondant has suggested that China didn't intentionally "align" Chinese models against the US (and Tibet, and Uyghur Muslims, and...). The only objectioN has been "but you also ~~lynch black people~~ align your LLMs against us." Classic Soviet-style whataboutism.

  >I wasn't crying foul because it's not aligned with the reality I want.
Which reality is that? Please be very specific. :)