logoalt Hacker News

account42 • today at 2:39 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

> What are the consequences?

> An attacker with the private key of any of the compromised intermediate CAs could impersonate any website or service.

And how many more times do we need to read this before we replace Web PKI with a system that isn't as completely insane?

We already have a functioning system for delegating domain ownership in a hierarchical fashion where compromises are limited to only the subtree under the compromised entity. Let's start using it for domain validation sooner rather than later.


Replies

vlan0 • today at 2:48 PM

>And how many more times do we need to read this before we replace Web PKI with a system that isn't as completely insane?

You say this like it's easy and simple and we are simply not choosing to do so.

➕ show 1 reply
quotemstr • today at 2:42 PM

> We already have a functioning system for delegating domain ownership in a hierarchical fashion

Well, yeah. DANE should have won. NameConstraints would be nice tooo, but who's going to make CAs use it?

And FFS, clients could at least check CRLs once in a while.

➕ show 2 replies