logoalt Hacker News

jacquesm • today at 3:29 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

Yes, this is the crunchy bit and we're already well underway on that curve. I haven't touched a frontier model in months because I can do with smaller ones without wondering/worrying when I'll get banned next because what I'm doing is dual use. Qwen was the the first time I thought oh, ok, so this is 90% of what I need. Then DS4 made that 95% and with GLM 5.3 it's somewhere between 99% and 100%. Now, I'm not trying to solve any Nobel prize winning stuff here but if that's the kind of customer that will remain I don't think the frontier model providers are going to like the next six months or so.


Replies

user43928 • today at 3:48 PM

That's the crux of the issue. You think that GLM 5.3 is all you need.

However, the expectations for AI are not to make your software engineering work 100% faster.

It's, for example, to build software more or less end-to-end with minimal input and feedback from you.

Then next, robotics and boosting manufacturing. Not by 10% but let's say 200%.

Such are the ambitions. Can GLM 5.3 do it?

The crucial question is whether eg. Fable 6 can, and with what lead over the competition.

Open-weight models still have not beat February's Mythos.

➕ show 1 reply