> That’s really not a teachable skilled to any real degree.

I strongly disagree with that.

> In my opinion, that heavily depends on your personality and depends significantly more on nature than nurture.

Nature has set us up to be amongst the most adaptive creatures on the planet. I think only the rats and the microbes have us beat. We are everywhere. One of the things that struck me while traveling the world and visiting some pretty out-of-the-way places is that there were always people living there as if it was perfectly normal.

> It’s also basically a tacit approval of dabbling in a field, or having a shallow knowledge of many fields, something I think the world will move further away from the more broad shallow tasks that AI will be able to accomplish at human levels.

Why would it have to be shallow? If you spend your time wisely you can easily pick up more than a shallow knowledge about multiple fields. Yes, it is work. So what.

> Teaching adaptability is basically a version of throwing up your hands and saying I don’t know what to do.

Not really, but again, you are welcome to that opinion, I just don't share it.

The time when a single skill would get you from the cradle to the grave is over and done with. And probably has been for a while but it is going to be much more fractured going forward.