logoalt Hacker News

doikor • today at 12:51 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

It’s not always possible depending on where you are.

Actual real reasons like possibility of continuous dark cold windless weeks in the winter and then the more common/real one. Politics.

Also if someone wants to build nuclear why would you not let them? More production in general is better as long as the public money put into it is the same per kWh produced as wind/solar/whatever why would I care?


Replies

ViewTrick1002 • today at 12:54 PM

System studies find that renewable energy systems are cheaper than involving new nuclear from Australia to Denmark and Finland.

Denmark, 2026: system-level LCOE including storage, flexibility and system integration; renewables substantially cheaper than nuclear.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422...

Finland, 2025: nuclear scenarios 71–84% higher system cost; unrestricted least-cost optimization builds zero new nuclear.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422...

Australia, CSIRO + AEMO GenCost 2025–26: whole-system modelling including transmission, storage and firming; renewables + storage remain the lowest-cost net-zero pathway.

https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/Ele...

What are these grid operators and researchers missing that you know?

➕ show 1 reply