logoalt Hacker News

piker • today at 1:13 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

Due respect, neither of those make sense. PHP is boring software, and this website routinely suggests (1) use it if it is fit for purpose and (2) don't rewrite for the sake of it. For most sites, the engineering effort to have a static backup of their dynamic website (say, generated by Wordpress or Drupal) just isn't possible. They just need to power down and patch.

[EDIT: I see I may have erroneously extended your criticism to sites other than NCSC, for which it does make sense. I would still defend using PHP.]


Replies

spockz • today at 2:29 PM

Why would you use boring tech to dynamically create sites that are inherently static?

➕ show 1 reply