logoalt Hacker News

TZubiri • today at 3:55 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

What's interesting here is that this will only affect those who did not migrate off LiteLLM after it was attacked the first time.

I'm not saying everyong should migrate after there's a vuln, but I'm definitely saying that. Unless it's something huge and foundational like a programming language (PHP gets a second chance), just migrate within the next couple of weeks.

I didn't even have it installed the first time, so the ideal programmers, (read, your competition), actually suffered 0 vulns from this dep, if you suffered 1, that's already pretty bad, being burnt twice should be a wake up call. If you get hit 3 times by the same dependency, it's a lost case.


Replies

wongarsu • today at 4:04 PM

As someone who does not use litellm but instead a barely maintained underpowered alternative: what did everyone migrate to?

If it matters, I am mostly interested in the aspect of having a proxy that unifies multiple ollama and openai-compatible endpoints with model-based routing and failover. Optionally with api-keys, reporting, budgets, etc. I do not particularly care about the MCP gateway, Agent-To-Agent thingy, and whatever else LiteLLM bolted on over time

➕ show 5 replies
john_strinlai • today at 4:04 PM

>PHP gets a second chance

second? i haven't kept count, but we have to be somewhere in the hundreds of chances now

antonvs • today at 5:31 PM

> I'm not saying everyone should migrate after there's a vuln, but I'm definitely saying that.

Turns out Ancient Aliens was onto something all along.