logoalt Hacker News

matheusmoreira • today at 12:48 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

> There is no charge to play the game on your own hardware.

They want to eliminate that. AIs will open source their games otherwise.


Replies

ahartmetz • today at 1:00 PM

"""Open sourcing""" (this needs maximum scare quotes) games by AI-washing the decompilation is legally just about the same as cracking. You won't be able to deploy the result on a walled garden console and most likely not for for money anywhere, and FOSS people won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.

➕ show 1 reply
jasomill • today at 1:34 PM

Not going to be viable for entire genres of games because latency.

AIs can't open source games, they can only assist in pirating them.

But pirates have historically done a pretty good job without AI.

Existing trends towards games with required online components, subscription-based content and microtransactions will no doubt continue, of course.

Not streaming, other than as an extra-cost option, because the margins on subscriptions and microtransactions are bound to be orders of magnitude higher while providing more value to the majority of players.

➕ show 1 reply
jrootabega • today at 10:22 PM

They will just eliminate "your own hardware".

paxy • today at 1:17 PM

Because games couldn't be pirated before AI?

➕ show 1 reply
malwrar • today at 1:15 PM

Predicting it now that people will vibecode open source clones built from having bots play the closed game for training data.