> It might even be sensible to intentionally revoke a small number of certificates every month, to make sure nobody is complacent.
No, this is not even remotely sensible.
Please elaborate. Conventional thinking goes that emergency plans must be exercised to make sure they’re actually effective.
It really is. It's basically chaos monkey for pki.
Code paths and procedures that aren't exercised regularly are broken.
Even better is having a way to reoke keys and big players occasionally include revoked keys in trust chains and blast a warning if the revoked key is considered valid.
Failure paths that are not exercised with regularity will inevitably fail in surprising ways when actually needed.