This seems reductionist with false equivalence. Wouldn't making a brain a "deterministic CPU" negate all the benefits of using organic tissue?
Probably, but the questions I was thinking of are whether it's the design or the substrate that we consider significant.
The question comes up a lot here when there are posts about whether to consider LLMs conscious.
"We're going to condemn conscious entities to slavery"
vs
"They'll always just be machines and it's dehumanizing to consider them anything else"
Not if the organic tissue is faster or more energy efficient.
Probably, but the questions I was thinking of are whether it's the design or the substrate that we consider significant.
The question comes up a lot here when there are posts about whether to consider LLMs conscious.
"We're going to condemn conscious entities to slavery"
vs
"They'll always just be machines and it's dehumanizing to consider them anything else"