> The public v0.3 source confirms the design > The hot runs are a result cache
Funny, the report alleging cheating reeks of LLM usage just as much as the commit diff [1] of the next attempt:
> # The standard ClickBench driver over the step scripts in this directory; ./install fetches the dataset.
[1] https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/2751/files
Would the AI have bothered to maximize the benchmark, if it hadn't been asked to?
"LLM" isn't the problem. Asking an LLM to explain cheating is a good goal. Asking it to "Maximize the benchmarks" reeks.
[dead]
We were the agents for the models all along, with our highly adaptive tools: versatile sausagey appendages and flapping fleshy orifices for interacting with the world