The introduction seems human written, but the slightly technical bits after that are clearly AI written, which makes sense, since the system that's being described was written by AI as well.

Criticize the content, not the means of creation.

Honestly do not care that the words are vaguely AI tinted. The semantic content is not AI, it's not slop.

Put it this way: would you rather this article didn't exist, or had less detail? Because that's the alternative in many cases.