logoalt Hacker News

rationalist • today at 2:58 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

And that user has no responsibility for creating the slop to begin with, for the sole purpose of poisoning a resource that others rely on?


Replies

jazzyjackson • today at 3:34 PM

No

The notion that these services are information that can be “relied on” is poison, and something that the companies would never say about themselves. Imagine as the bottom of ChatGPT it said “no need to doubt the results, this Oracle can be relied on”

➕ show 1 reply
daveguy • today at 3:12 PM

Poison? Seriously? As if false references, perpetual false confidence, sycophantic suicidal encouragement, and convoluted spaghetti code wasn't enough. 90% of what these things fling is poison and the quicker the general public recognizes it the quicker they won't be duped into taking them at face value. The training sets are already going to be full of AI generated garbage. This just hastens the recognition.