> Yes it is my personal belief that we are definitely much much better at creating than AI models, which the only thing they do is output an empty and dull regurgitation of its training. There's nothing truly personal and original coming out of it when it comes to creating music, literature, art, etc.

I guess those AI models were trained on solutions to Navier-Stokes and a proof of the Quasi-Riemann hypothesis.

> Do you know why I am so against all this hype? Because it is a poison for the mind, it deprives you from thinking from understanding and from questioning things by ourselves, and I'm already witnessing AI junkies that consume and take for granted every single output from a model.

This argument has been made against every human innovation, including writing. Maybe it's true this time but I doubt it.

> Why think if you can now outsource it to a computer, right?

I was already outsourcing plenty to the wikipedia, do-yourself-youtube videos, and so on. This doesn't seem that different.