People think OpenAI and Anthropic are just these wildly unprofitable companies with no future or business.
They know what they’re doing. The naysayers are like the people that said this little internet thing wasn’t going anywhere.
>They know what they’re doing. The naysayers are like the people that said this little internet thing wasn’t going anywhere.
There's a big difference between people saying OpenAI/Antropic wont survive and LLMs wont survive. A lot of big early players in the internet space died off as well.
Whether you think they have a future or not does not change fact that they currently are wildly unprofitable.
>internet thing wasn’t going anywhere.
This is conflating the utility of the technology with the economics behind it. Few people claim LLMs are useless. It's a question of figuring out a viable business model.
> The naysayers are like the people that said this little internet thing wasn’t going anywhere.
The same rhetorical tactic was used to diminish blockchain critics.
Might want to Google Global Crossing. The internet survived, but most giant companies did not.
It sounds like you're just a "yessayer", though? Not much different from naysayers, just on the opposite side.
One thing that naysayers have going on for them is the fact that those companies indeed aren't making profit right now.
So did the bankers in 2008.
Crazy how delusional people are.
They are in too deep - they have to believe it all works out and act accordingly. lmao.
The Internet was profitable, but I'm not connecting to this website from my Solaris Sun Microsystems machine using Netscape Navigator