logoalt Hacker News

pseudosavant • yesterday at 5:22 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

They are making $600k in net income per employee. 10+ years ago, I'd never seen a mass layoff at any company making that kind of money per employee.

Their net income is up more than 2x in just the last 5 years. 10 years ago, Microsoft only had $85B in revenue, now they are up to $134B in net income, and they need to let 25% of the company leave?


Replies

pseudosavant • today at 12:02 AM

I'll also note that the 25% didn't include anyone VP or higher. So, the most expensive employees aren't being shown the exit, just the people doing the actual work.

hibikir • yesterday at 5:59 PM

If I have a team of 20, making a lot of money, but I think I can do the exact same job with 15 because of AI productivity gains, should I keep the other 5 employed for the vibes?

The total net income doesn't matter: The move is management saying they are overstaffed for the work they think they need.

Assume Microsoft is expecting just a third of people to take the offer. It's just too many people to want to move to a different division that needs more labor: It's basically entire divisions that they'd have to create from whole cloth.

➕ show 3 replies
mr_toad • yesterday at 5:44 PM

> now they are up to $134B in net income, and they need to let 25% of the company leave?

Tomorrow they’ll announce that they’re going to spend $134b on new data centers.

ricardobayes • yesterday at 5:27 PM

Contrast that with NVIDIA's princely $2.5M net income per employee.

bijowo1676 • yesterday at 5:28 PM

profitable divisions are making more than that per employee

while other divisions are sinking ship

there always a case for a yard cleanup and decluttering