logoalt Hacker News

Nvidia discusses $2k-per-GPU annual fee for software

25 points • by gscott • today at 5:34 PM • 15 comments • view on HN

Comments

vkaku • today at 7:57 PM

Everyone is making better software than NVIDIA today with AI, to the extent they are un-nerfing hardware and making stuff run 2x faster. Why would anyone in their sane mind pay NVIDIA anything when they can vibe engineer a faster library?

➕ show 1 reply
TazeTSchnitzel • today at 6:09 PM

What software is this? A value-add nobody uses, or a core CUDA component everyone is stuck with?

Kevin_Flynn • today at 5:50 PM

At what point do market forces take over, and give Nvidia the collective middle finger ?

Couldn't customer #1 just have AI reverse engineer, clean room recode, and open source publish it, because its software ?

It's all in how your attorneys define "clean room" now isn't it ?

➕ show 1 reply
Danox • today at 7:45 PM

Apple dropped them for a reason...

MisterMunchkin • today at 8:36 PM

Lmao! Sorry AI companies, even if you somehow survive to profitability, daddy Nvidia will just decide you have to pay rent in perpetuity. 99% margin on chips isn’t enough.

throwaway919233 • today at 7:04 PM

Surprised its not based on wattage

mrlonglong • today at 6:13 PM

Time for a Linus Torvalds middle finger.

cyanydeez • today at 7:01 PM

Someone put up a ishuggingfacedead.com death watch and just post articles like this until it's obvious.

➕ show 1 reply
j45 • today at 6:24 PM

First it was licensing per cpu, now gpu?

klasnor • today at 8:56 PM

[flagged]

verdverm • today at 5:40 PM

buy the hardware and pay rent, even better /s