Taking the benchmarks in the article at face value, this is ~on par with Opus 5.5 for ~1/4 the price!
Taking the benchmarks (as reported by OpenAI) at face value, why wouldn't they show Opus 5.5 on the OS world benchmark, and show no Anthropic models at all on the "factual error rate" benchmark
...no it's not? At max effort, it scores 50% on terminal bench vs. Opus 5.5's 70%.
Which is why I don't take the benchmarks at face value...