logoalt Hacker News

boringg • today at 2:10 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

Its also tricky to defend in war prone locations.

I think solar is amazing and we need more of it - but I can't stand this solar and storage go at it alone mentality. It's pretty thickheaded to discount the other forms of energy that we can use and will need.


Replies

rgmerk • today at 3:23 AM

In practice, in Ukraine distributed solar power has been an increasingly important source of resilience in their power supply system.

There are legit reasons to push back against “solar and batteries everywhere” but I find it hard to credit resilience in a conflict situation as one of them.

Gigachad • today at 2:12 AM

I think I'd rather a solar panel array be bombed than a nuclear power plant.

Solar has the advantage that it can be widely distributed on buildings rather than in just a few centralized locations.

zardo • today at 2:44 AM

I don't see how anything would be more resilient than solar.

➕ show 1 reply