But as far as i know GPL does not prevent you from using it for training?
No, the question is, if the GPL'ed code/structure is more or less recovered during inference, would a court rule the result to be covered by the GPL?
I know there was some cases in the past where people swapped licences and changed variablenames,etc but the essential code clearly remained.
No, the question is, if the GPL'ed code/structure is more or less recovered during inference, would a court rule the result to be covered by the GPL?
I know there was some cases in the past where people swapped licences and changed variablenames,etc but the essential code clearly remained.