Sure you can, it's called conservapedia. Problem: most of the facts on conservapedia are not facts. It's entertaining to skim through though.
> Problem: most of the facts on conservapedia are not facts
Well, that's exactly what I said. A "Wikipedia" implies that what's written there is based on facts.
> It's entertaining to skim through though
Not really. The stuff coming out of the GOP that makes its way across the pond is bad enough.
> Problem: most of the facts on conservapedia are not facts
Well, that's exactly what I said. A "Wikipedia" implies that what's written there is based on facts.
> It's entertaining to skim through though
Not really. The stuff coming out of the GOP that makes its way across the pond is bad enough.