logoalt Hacker News

malfist • yesterday at 5:36 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

Why isn't the comparison meaningful? Aaron broke the law and circumvented protections, Anthropic broke the law and circumvented protections. Regardless of if Aaron broke into a network closet or anthropic broke DRM, anthropic took explicit action to receive knowingly stolen goods.


Replies

sillysaurusx • yesterday at 5:42 PM

The CFAA is for unauthorized access to a computer system. Downloading from libgen isn't unauthorized access that can be prosecuted under the CFAA.

Say you have a network. You want to keep someone out of it. The tool for that is the CFAA.

If you have a book, and you want to stop someone from reproducing it, the tool for that is copyright.

They cover different domains. If you're not breaking into a network, you're unlikely to be charged under the CFAA.

➕ show 2 replies